Skip to content
MRI Knee

MRNet

MRNet: A Dataset of Knee MRIs

1,370 clinical knee MRI exams from Stanford University Medical Center (2001-2012) with report-derived labels for abnormality, ACL tear and meniscal tear; 120 exams form a hidden test set. Non-commercial research use only.

Overview

MRNet is a collection of 1,370 clinical knee MRI exams from Stanford University Medical Center, acquired between 2001 and 2012. The Stanford Machine Learning Group assembled it to train and evaluate MRNet, a convolutional network that classifies whole knee exams, and released it together with a public benchmark. Each exam carries three binary labels: any abnormality, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and meniscal tear. The data are now distributed by the Stanford AIMI center through Redivis.

Composition

Of the 1,370 exams, 1,104 are abnormal, 319 show an ACL tear and 508 a meniscal tear; 194 have both tears. The exams are divided into a training set (1,130 exams, 1,088 patients with an identifier), a validation set (120 exams, 111 patients) and a test set (120 exams, 113 patients). The paper calls the validation set the tuning set and the test set the validation set. All exams of one patient fall into the same split, and the two smaller sets were sampled so that each holds at least 50 positive cases per label. The test set is held back for the benchmark and is not part of the download. The mean patient age is 38.0 years, and 569 exams belong to female patients.

Acquisition

All exams were done on GE scanners with a standard knee coil and a routine protocol without contrast: coronal T1-weighted, coronal T2-weighted with fat saturation, sagittal proton density, sagittal T2-weighted with fat saturation and axial proton density with fat saturation. 775 exams were acquired at 3 T and the rest at 1.5 T. The paper used three series per exam (sagittal T2-weighted, coronal T1-weighted and axial proton density), resampled to 256 × 256 pixels.

Annotations

Training and validation labels were extracted by hand from the clinical radiology reports. For the test set, the reference labels are the majority vote of three musculoskeletal radiologists who had the images, reports, clinical history and follow-up exams.

Known limitations

Released labels come from reports, not surgery, and are exam-level only, with no localization. The data come from one institution and one scanner vendor. The research use agreement forbids commercial use, redistribution and derivative works.

Cohort

Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the largest value.

Age

mean 38

No age bins reported.

Condition

studies, values can overlap

  • Meniscal tear 508 37%
  • Anterior cruciate ligament tear 319 23%

Scanner vendor

studies

  • GE HealthCare 1,370 100%

Field strength

studies

  • 3 T 775 57%
  • 1.5 T 595 43%

Split

subjects

  • Training 1,088
  • Test 113
  • Validation 111

License and access

Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer

Access
Free registration

Create an account and accept terms online

Register and accept the Stanford research use agreement. The data are downloaded through Redivis. The test set is not released.

Access page

Stanford University School of Medicine Dataset Research Use Agreement (AIMI)

Free for personal, non-commercial research only. You may not share the data or the download link, may not create derivative works, and must not try to re-identify patients. Stanford sells a separate commercial license.

The MRNet page publishes the Stanford University School of Medicine Research Use Agreement with "MRNet Dataset" as the dataset name. It also states that the dataset is for non-clinical research use only and must not be relied upon in patient care.

Original license text Version read: Text shown in the Stanford AIMI shared-datasets portal, read 2026-10-07 (no version number given) Checked 2026-10-07

What you can do

  • No
  • Not stated
  • No
  • Not stated

What you can share

  • No
  • No
  • Share trained models Not stated

What you must do

  • Yes
  • Share alike No
  • Yes
  • Ethics approval No
  • Manuscript review No
  • Release code No
  • Return results No
  • No

Limits

  • Yes
  • Location limits No

Commercial license: Yes Companies can apply for a one-year license per dataset, reviewed by a Stanford committee. The page lists an annual fee of USD 70,000 per dataset for agreements contracted in FY25. Details

Citation

Bien N, Rajpurkar P, Ball RL, et al. Deep-learning-assisted diagnosis for knee magnetic resonance imaging: Development and retrospective validation of MRNet. PLoS Med 15(11): e1002699 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002699. Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.71718/rcbp-8c35

All numbers

Every number on this page, as stored in stats.csv, with its source.

MeasureBreakdownValueSource
Studiestotal
knee MRI exams performed 2001-2012
1,370bien2018
Methods - Dataset
Studiessplit=train 1,130mrnet-page
Splits
Studiessplit=validation
called tuning set in the paper
120mrnet-page
Splits
Studiessplit=test
hidden test set (validation set in the paper); not released
120mrnet-page
Splits
Subjectssplit=train
for the 1114 training exams with a patient identifier
1,088bien2018
Table 1
Subjectssplit=validation 111mrnet-page
Splits
Subjectssplit=test 113mrnet-page
Splits
Studiessex=female
reported as female patients; the percentage (41.5%) is of the 1,370 exams
569bien2018
Abstract
Studiessplit=train;sex=female
reported as female patients; the percentage is of exams
480bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=validation;sex=female
reported as female patients; the percentage is of exams
50bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=test;sex=female
reported as female patients; the percentage is of exams
39bien2018
Table 1
Mean agetotal 38bien2018
Abstract
Studiescondition=acl_tear
labels from clinical reports
319bien2018
Methods - Dataset
Studiescondition=meniscal_tear
labels from clinical reports
508bien2018
Methods - Dataset
Studiessplit=train;condition=acl_tear
labels from clinical reports
208bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=validation;condition=acl_tear
labels from clinical reports
54bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=test;condition=acl_tear
labels from clinical reports; 58 by the radiologist reference standard
57bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=train;condition=meniscal_tear
labels from clinical reports
397bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=validation;condition=meniscal_tear
labels from clinical reports
52bien2018
Table 1
Studiessplit=test;condition=meniscal_tear
labels from clinical reports; 65 by the radiologist reference standard
59bien2018
Table 1
Studiesfield_strength=3 775bien2018
Methods - Dataset
Studiesfield_strength=1.5
1,370 minus the 775 exams at 3 T; the paper states the remaining exams used 1.5 T
595bien2018
Methods - Dataset
Studiesvendor=ge
all exams on GE scanners
1,370bien2018
Methods - Dataset

Sources

The keys used in the table above.