Sports Betting Cue Exposure fMRI
Increased brain reactivity to gambling unavailability as a marker of problem gambling
Brain MRI and cue-exposure task fMRI of frequent sports bettors with and without problem gambling, collected to test whether brain reactivity to sport events that are blocked for betting marks problem gambling and low self-control.
Overview
This OpenNeuro release (ds002513) holds the MRI data behind a study of sports bettors and problem gambling. Frequent sports bettors watched cues for real upcoming sport events during functional MRI. Some events could be bet on and some were shown as blocked, and the cues varied in how confident the bettor was of winning. The study asked whether brain responses to events that could not be bet on differ between problem and nonproblem bettors, and whether they relate to sports betting passion and trait self-control, both measured by questionnaire. The authors report higher insula and striatum responses to blocked events in problem bettors. The data are shared under a CC0 waiver.
Composition
The release contains 65 frequent sports bettors. The paper classes 30 of them as problem bettors and 35 as nonproblem bettors. Each participant has one T1-weighted image, one run of the cue-exposure task with its event file, and a fieldmap (magnitude and phase-difference image). The release has no participants table, so group membership, sex, age and questionnaire scores are not part of the shared files.
Acquisition
All scans come from one 3T Siemens Prisma fit at Ghent University Hospital in Belgium, according to the image sidecars. The T1-weighted image is an MPRAGE (repetition time 2.25 s, echo time 4.18 ms, inversion time 0.9 s). The task run is gradient-echo EPI with a repetition time of 1.72 s and an echo time of 27 ms. The images are stored as uncompressed NIfTI with BIDS sidecars.
Known limitations
- Single site and scanner, and a small sample.
- No participants table: the problem and nonproblem group labels, demographics and scale scores needed to reproduce the group analysis are not in the release.
- Only one task run per subject; there is no resting-state or diffusion data.
- The condition tag marks the study's problem bettor group, which is a study classification rather than a stated clinical diagnosis of gambling disorder.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 65 subjects.
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- T1-weighted 65 100%
- BOLD fMRI 65 100%
sub-*/anat/*_T1w.nii, sub-*/func/*_bold.nii in BIDS file tree of ds002513 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix and JSON sidecars read for scanner, field strength and site
Field strength
- 3 T 65 100%
*_T1w.json MagneticFieldStrength in BIDS file tree of ds002513 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix and JSON sidecars read for scanner, field strength and site
Condition
Groups can overlap
- Gambling disorder 30 46%
Abstract in Brevers et al. 2021, Increased brain reactivity to gambling unavailability as a marker of problem gambling
Scanner vendor
- Siemens Healthineers 65 100%
*_T1w.json Manufacturer in BIDS file tree of ds002513 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix and JSON sidecars read for scanner, field strength and site
Country
- Belgium 65 100%
*_T1w.json InstitutionName in BIDS file tree of ds002513 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix and JSON sidecars read for scanner, field strength and site
Contrast combinations
How many subjects have exactly each set of contrasts.
| T1w | bold | Subjects with exactly this set |
|---|---|---|
65 |
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Download without an account
Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal
Public domain dedication. Do anything with the data, including commercial use, without asking and without having to give credit.
dataset_description.json of snapshot 1.0.0 states "License" CC0.
What you can do
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you can share
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you must do
- No
- Share alike No
- No
- No
- Manuscript review No
- Release code No
- Return results No
- Delete after use No
Limits
- No
- Location limits No
Citation
Brevers D, Baeken C, Bechara A, He Q, Maurage P, Petieau M, Sescousse G, Vögele C, Billieux J. Increased brain reactivity to gambling unavailability as a marker of problem gambling. Addiction Biology 26(4):e12996 (2021). doi:10.1111/adb.12996
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.
- Brevers et al. 2021, Increased brain reactivity to gambling unavailability as a marker of problem gambling paper
- OpenNeuro ds002513 snapshot 1.0.0 (dataset_description.json, CHANGES and snapshot size) website
- BIDS file tree of ds002513 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix and JSON sidecars read for scanner, field strength and site computed