SixthSense
Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes
Task fMRI and T1-weighted brain MRI of young adults who watched The Sixth Sense with the twist shown first, last or not at all, then recalled each scene aloud, to study how new information updates memories of past events.
Overview
This OpenNeuro release holds the raw fMRI data of a Princeton University study by Asieh Zadbood, Uri Hasson and colleagues on how the brain revises memories of past events once new information changes their meaning. Participants watched a shortened cut of the film The Sixth Sense in the scanner and then described each scene aloud from short cues. One group learned the twist ending before the film, one saw it at the end, and one never saw it, which lets researchers compare event representations with and without updating. Data are in BIDS under CC0.
Composition
57 right-handed native English speakers: 18 in the spoiled group, 19 in the twist group and 20 in the no-twist group, coded 1 to 3 in the condition column of participants.tsv. The paper scanned 66 people aged 18 to 24 (21 men) and excluded nine; age and sex of the 57 released subjects are not given. Each subject folder holds one T1-weighted image, one movie run, one recall run (two or three for six subjects whose recall was paused) and a pair of opposite phase-encoding field maps, without sessions.
Acquisition
All scans were made on a Siemens Prisma 3 T scanner with a 64-channel head coil. Functional runs use interleaved multiband EPI (TR 1500 ms, TE 33 ms, flip angle 80 degrees, 2 mm slices, simultaneous multi-slice factor 4). The anatomical image is an MPRAGE at 1 mm isotropic resolution, taken before the film. Field maps were acquired after the recall run. Spoken recall was recorded in the scanner with a noise-cancelling optical microphone.
Annotations
There are no image labels. Event files mark the onset of each of the 18 film scenes in the movie run and of each recalled scene in the recall runs, with its duration; recall event files add a column named correct. scene_info.txt describes the content of each scene. The run length in volumes is part of each functional file name and of participants.tsv.
Known limitations
- Runs were stopped by hand, so run lengths differ between subjects.
- Age and sex are reported only for all 66 scanned people, not for the released subset.
- Single site, narrow age range, one film.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 57 subjects.
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- T1-weighted 57 100%
- BOLD fMRI 57 100%
anat/*_T1w.nii.gz, func/*_bold.nii.gz in File tree of ds004359 snapshot 1.0.0 (CC0), NIfTI files counted per subject and BIDS suffix
Country
- United States 57 100%
Materials and methods: Participants in Zadbood et al. 2022, Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes, eLife
Scanner vendor
- Siemens Healthineers 57 100%
Materials and methods: MRI acquisition in Zadbood et al. 2022, Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes, eLife
Field strength
- 3 T 57 100%
Materials and methods: MRI acquisition in Zadbood et al. 2022, Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes, eLife
Contrast combinations
How many subjects have exactly each set of contrasts.
| T1w | bold | Subjects with exactly this set |
|---|---|---|
57 |
sub-*/ in File tree of ds004359 snapshot 1.0.0 (CC0), NIfTI files counted per subject and BIDS suffix
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Download without an account
Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal
Public domain dedication. Do anything with the data, including commercial use, without asking and without having to give credit.
dataset_description.json of snapshot 1.0.0 states "License" CC0.
What you can do
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you can share
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you must do
- No
- Share alike No
- No
- No
- Manuscript review No
- Release code No
- Return results No
- Delete after use No
Limits
- No
- Location limits No
Citation
Zadbood A, Nastase SA, Chen J, Norman KA, Hasson U. Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes. eLife 11:e79045 (2022). doi:10.7554/eLife.79045
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.
- Zadbood et al. 2022, Neural representations of naturalistic events are updated as our understanding of the past changes, eLife paper
- OpenNeuro ds004359 snapshot 1.0.0 (dataset_description.json, README, CHANGES, sidecars and snapshot summary) website
- participants.tsv of ds004359 snapshot 1.0.0 (CC0), condition column computed
- File tree of ds004359 snapshot 1.0.0 (CC0), NIfTI files counted per subject and BIDS suffix computed