Rotterdam Study (Rotterdam Scan Study)
The Rotterdam Study and its brain imaging arm, the Rotterdam Scan Study
Repeated brain MRI of middle-aged and older adults from a Dutch population-based cohort, collected to study causes and early signs of dementia, stroke and small vessel disease, with long clinical follow-up. Also CT and MRI of arteries and knees. On request.
Overview
The Rotterdam Study is a prospective population-based cohort run by Erasmus MC in the Ommoord district of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. It follows middle-aged and older residents to find causes and early markers of common diseases of ageing. Its brain imaging arm, the Rotterdam Scan Study, scans participants repeatedly so that brain changes can be related to later dementia, stroke and cognitive decline, which the cohort tracks through linkage with medical records.
Composition
The cohort started in 1990 with 7,983 people aged 55 and over, added 3,011 people in 2000 and 3,932 people aged 45 and over in 2006, for 14,926 participants by 2008. An extension of people aged 40 and over began in 2016. Random subsets had brain MRI in 1995 and 1999 (567 people); from 2005 brain MRI became part of the core protocol for everyone without contraindications or claustrophobia. By July 2015 there were 12,174 brain scans in over 5,800 people, and the 2020 design update reports more than 12,000 scans in over 8,000 people. Some participants have four or more MRI visits. The same cohort has CT of arterial calcification (2,500 people), carotid MRI (over 1,500) and knee MRI (over 800). A dementia study on diffusion MRI of 4,415 non-demented participants found 101 incident dementia cases.
Acquisition
Since 2005 brain MRI runs on one dedicated GE 1.5 T scanner with an 8-channel head coil, kept without software or hardware upgrades for comparability. The protocol has 3D T1-weighted, proton-density, FLAIR, 3D T2*-weighted gradient echo for microbleeds, 25-direction diffusion tensor imaging and phase-contrast flow for total cerebral blood flow. Resting-state fMRI was added in mid-2011. Scanner details for the carotid and knee MRI are not given in the papers read. The 2020 update describes florbetaben amyloid PET in 700 participants as ongoing since 2018 and a planned 7 T substudy of 200 participants; neither is listed as collected here.
Annotations
Automated tissue, white matter lesion and hippocampus segmentations are checked visually. Trained physicians rate infarcts, microbleeds, perivascular spaces and incidental findings.
Known limitations
- Images are not public. Data are released on request through the study management team under an unpublished approval protocol.
- Subject counts are lower bounds taken from "over N" statements; per-sequence counts are not published.
- The cohort comes from one district of one Dutch city.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 8,000 subjects.
Modality
- MRI 8,000 100%
- CT 2,500 31%
Population imaging in epidemiology in Ikram et al. 2020, Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study, European Journal of Epidemiology
Anatomy
- Brain 8,000 100%
- Heart 2,500 31%
- Carotid artery 2,500 31%
- Knee 800 10%
Population imaging in epidemiology, Population imaging in epidemiology; Cardiovascular diseases in Ikram et al. 2020, Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study, European Journal of Epidemiology
Field strength
- 1.5 T 5,800 73%
Design and study population; Scan protocol in Ikram et al. 2015, The Rotterdam Scan Study, design update 2016 and main findings, European Journal of Epidemiology
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- Diffusion-weighted 4,415 55%
Condition
Groups can overlap
- Dementia 101 1%
- Alzheimer's disease 83 1%
Scanner vendor
- GE HealthCare 5,800 73%
Design and study population; Scan protocol in Ikram et al. 2015, The Rotterdam Scan Study, design update 2016 and main findings, European Journal of Epidemiology
Country
- Netherlands 8,000 100%
Introduction in Ikram et al. 2020, Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study, European Journal of Epidemiology
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Ask the authors or the data holder. No published process or terms, and access is at their discretion
Rotterdam Study papers state that data can be obtained on request from the management team (datamanagement.ergo@erasmusmc.nl), which follows a protocol for approving requests, and that privacy rules and participant consent rule out a public repository. The protocol itself is not published.
No published license or data use terms
The data holder has published no license and no data use terms. Any use, sharing or commercial right has to be agreed with the data holder, and nothing can be assumed to be allowed. Default copyright and data protection law still apply.
The data availability statement names a request route and an internal approval protocol but publishes no terms of use. The study website gives no license or data use agreement.
What you can do
- Commercial use Not stated
- Not stated
- Train ML models Not stated
- Create derived data Not stated
- Publish results Not stated
What you can share
- Share the data Not stated
- Share derived data Not stated
- Share trained models Not stated
What you must do
- Cite or credit Not stated
- Share alike Not stated
- Sign an agreement Not stated
- Ethics approval Not stated
- Manuscript review Not stated
- Release code Not stated
- Return results Not stated
- Delete after use Not stated
Limits
- No re-identification Not stated
- Location limits Not stated
Citation
Ikram MA, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ, Koudstaal PJ, Krestin GP, Hofman A, Bos D, Vernooij MW. The Rotterdam Scan Study: design update 2016 and main findings. European Journal of Epidemiology 30(12):1299-1315 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10654-015-0105-7
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.
- Ikram et al. 2015, The Rotterdam Scan Study, design update 2016 and main findings, European Journal of Epidemiology paper
- Ikram et al. 2020, Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study, European Journal of Epidemiology paper
- Cremers et al. 2020, Structural disconnectivity and the risk of dementia in the general population, Neurology, supplement record website
- Boons et al. 2026, Loss of microstructural integrity in left hemispheric white matter tracts is associated with poorer digits in noise understanding, GeroScience 2026, data availability statement paper
- Rotterdam Study (ERGO) website, research lines website