Network Sampling Intelligence fMRI
Neuroimaging evidence for network sampling theory of human intelligence
Task fMRI and T1-weighted MRI of healthy young adults who each performed twelve cognitive tasks of planning, reasoning, attention and working memory in separate runs, acquired at 3T in London, Ontario (60 subjects).
Overview
This OpenNeuro release (ds003148) holds the raw MRI behind a Nature Communications study that tested whether performance on intelligence tests reflects how flexibly the brain recruits its functional networks. Sixty adults performed a battery of twelve cognitive tasks inside the scanner, one fMRI run per task, and the authors related the task activation and connectivity patterns to individual differences in performance. The data are shared under a CC0 waiver. Processed data from the same study were deposited separately on figshare and are not part of this entry.
Composition
The release contains 60 healthy adults (35 women) aged 18 to 38 years, mean age 22.95, recruited at and around the University of Western Ontario. Each subject has one T1-weighted structural image and twelve task fMRI runs with event files, giving 780 NIfTI volumes in total. The task labels in the file names are Digit, Feature, Grammatical, ML, Odd, Paired, Polygon, Rotation, SOS, Spatial, Tree and Trouble. There is no participants table, so age and sex are only available as group figures from the paper.
Acquisition
All scans were acquired on a single 3T Siemens TIM Trio at the institution recorded in the sidecars as Robarts, in London, Ontario. Functional runs are gradient-echo EPI with a repetition time of 2 s, 36 slices of 3 mm, an 80 x 80 matrix and an echo time of 30 ms; the first ten volumes of each run were discarded. Each run had three one-minute task blocks separated by 20 s of rest, about 60 minutes of fMRI per person. The structural scan is a 1 mm MPRAGE. Anatomical images were defaced with spm_deface.
Known limitations
- Single site and scanner, and a small sample of young, mostly student-age adults.
- No participants.tsv: individual age, sex and task scores are not in the release.
- The README and paper give a flip angle of 90 degrees for the EPI, while the JSON sidecars state 50 degrees.
- Each task has only one run per subject, administered in a fixed order.
- No derivatives, fieldmaps or resting-state data are included.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 60 subjects.
Sex
- Female 35 58%
- Male 25 42%
Methods: Participants in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Condition
Groups can overlap
- Healthy control 60 100%
Methods: Participants in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Scanner vendor
- Siemens Healthineers 60 100%
Methods: MRI acquisition in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Country
- Canada 60 100%
Methods: Participants in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Age
mean 23, range 18 to 38
No age bins reported.
Methods: Participants in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- T1-weighted 60 100%
- BOLD fMRI 60 100%
From BIDS file tree and JSON sidecars of ds003148 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix
Field strength
- 3 T 60 100%
Methods: MRI acquisition in Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications)
Contrast combinations
How many subjects have exactly each set of contrasts.
| T1w | bold | Subjects with exactly this set |
|---|---|---|
60 |
From BIDS file tree and JSON sidecars of ds003148 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Download without an account
Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal
Public domain dedication. Do anything with the data, including commercial use, without asking and without having to give credit.
dataset_description.json of snapshot 1.0.1 states "License" CC0.
What you can do
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you can share
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you must do
- No
- Share alike No
- No
- No
- Manuscript review No
- Release code No
- Return results No
- Delete after use No
Limits
- No
- Location limits No
Citation
Soreq E, Violante IR, Daws RE, Hampshire A. Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance. Nature Communications 12, 2072 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.
- Soreq et al. 2021, Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance (Nature Communications) paper
- OpenNeuro ds003148 snapshot 1.0.1 (dataset_description.json, README, CHANGES and snapshot size) website
- BIDS file tree and JSON sidecars of ds003148 (CC0), raw NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix computed