Dynamic_Passive_Threat
Dynamic threat-of-shock fMRI (Dynamic Threat Processing)
Task fMRI with T1- and T2-weighted brain MRI of healthy adults watching two moving circles whose collision triggers an electric shock, collected to study how threat proximity, direction (approach or retreat) and speed shape brain responses during anticipation of threat.
Overview
This OpenNeuro release (ds002320) holds the MRI of a threat-of-shock experiment run by the Laboratory of Cognition and Emotion at the University of Maryland, College Park. Healthy adults watched two circles drift around the screen while knowing that a collision of the circles would deliver an unpleasant, non-painful electric shock. Because the distance, direction and speed of the circles changed continuously, the study could test how these threat factors interact in regions such as the anterior insula, amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and periaqueductal gray. The data are shared under a CC0 waiver.
Composition
The snapshot contains 82 healthy adult volunteers, each scanned in a single session. Two of them (sub-16 and sub-44) were added in version 1.1.0. Subject numbers run from 01 to 93 with gaps. No participants table is included, so age and sex are not available in the release.
Acquisition
All scans come from a Siemens 3T TRIO with a 32-channel head coil. Each subject has a 0.8 mm isotropic T2-weighted SPACE scan and a 0.8 mm isotropic T1-weighted MPRAGE. The task (named "circles" in the files) ran for up to six runs of 457 volumes each, acquired with a multiband EPI sequence (multiband factor 6, TR 1 s, TE 39 ms, 2.2 mm isotropic voxels). Each run held six 60-second blocks of moving circles separated by 15-second blank periods. A double-echo field map (two magnitude images and a phase image) is included per subject. Events files give the task timing.
Known limitations
- Single site and scanner.
- 11 subjects have fewer than six task runs (480 runs in total out of a possible 492).
- Skin conductance was recorded during scanning according to the paper, but it is not part of the release.
- The paper reports on 85 participants (41 female, aged 18 to 40) after excluding 8 of the 93 recruited, which does not match the 82 subjects released, so its demographics cannot be transferred to this release.
- The same sample was analysed earlier at the network level in a separate study.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 82 subjects.
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- T1-weighted 82 100%
- T2-weighted 82 100%
- BOLD fMRI 82 100%
From File tree of ds002320 snapshot 1.1.0 (CC0), NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix
Field strength
- 3 T 82 100%
Methods: MRI data acquisition in Meyer, Padmala and Pessoa 2019, Dynamic Threat Processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Condition
Groups can overlap
- Healthy control 82 100%
README in OpenNeuro ds002320 snapshot 1.1.0 (dataset_description.json, README, CHANGES and snapshot size)
Scanner vendor
- Siemens Healthineers 82 100%
Methods: MRI data acquisition in Meyer, Padmala and Pessoa 2019, Dynamic Threat Processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Country
- United States 82 100%
Methods: Participants in Meyer, Padmala and Pessoa 2019, Dynamic Threat Processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Contrast combinations
How many subjects have exactly each set of contrasts.
| T1w | T2w | bold | Subjects with exactly this set |
|---|---|---|---|
82 |
From File tree of ds002320 snapshot 1.1.0 (CC0), NIfTI files under sub-*/ counted per suffix
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Download without an account
Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal
Public domain dedication. Do anything with the data, including commercial use, without asking and without having to give credit.
dataset_description.json of snapshot 1.1.0 states "License" CC0.
What you can do
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you can share
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
What you must do
- No
- Share alike No
- No
- No
- Manuscript review No
- Release code No
- Return results No
- Delete after use No
Limits
- No
- Location limits No
Citation
Meyer C, Padmala S, Pessoa L. Dynamic Threat Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 31(4), 522-542 (2019). doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01363
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.