ACDC
Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (MICCAI 2017)
Cine cardiac MRI of patients with normal hearts, previous infarction, dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or an abnormal right ventricle, with expert ventricle and myocardium segmentations, a benchmark for cardiac segmentation and diagnosis. 150 patients from Dijon in five equal groups.
Overview
ACDC is the dataset of the Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge held at MICCAI 2017. It pairs cine cardiac MRI with expert segmentations and a diagnostic group for every patient, and is one of the standard benchmarks for segmenting the ventricles and myocardium and for classifying cardiac pathologies from the resulting volumes and ejection fractions.
Composition
There are 150 patients, each with one exam, in five groups of 30: normal cardiac anatomy and function, systolic heart failure after myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and abnormal right ventricle. The groups were assigned from clinical reports using thresholds on ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, wall thickness and myocardial mass, and ambiguous cases were left out. The training set has 100 patients (20 per group) and the test set 50 (10 per group). The test labels were first kept private; the creators now publish the data and ground truth of both sets. Each patient folder holds the 4D cine sequence, the end-diastolic and end-systolic frames with their masks, and a small file with group, height, weight and frame numbers.
Acquisition
Exams come from routine care at the University Hospital of Dijon over six years, on two Siemens scanners, a 1.5 T system and a 3 T Siemens Trio Tim. Short-axis slices from base to apex were acquired with a breath-hold SSFP sequence, usually 5 mm thick, with 28 to 40 frames over the cardiac cycle. Long-axis slices were not included. Data are stored as NIfTI.
Annotations
Two experts with 10 and 20 years of experience drew and cross-checked the left ventricular cavity, the myocardium and the right ventricular cavity at end-diastole and end-systole, reaching consensus when they disagreed. Papillary muscles are counted as cavity.
Known limitations
- Single centre, single vendor, small cohort.
- Groups are balanced by design and do not reflect clinical prevalence.
- Age and sex are not part of the public files.
- Slice thickness and gaps vary between exams.
Cohort
Aggregate numbers from the sources below. Bars are relative to the 150 subjects.
Contrast / sequence
Groups can overlap
- Cine MRI 150 100%
From ACDC challenge website, dataset pages (overview, training, testing)
Split
- Training 100 67%
- Test 50 33%
From ACDC challenge website, dataset pages (overview, training, testing)
Condition
Groups can overlap
- Healthy control 30 20%
- Myocardial infarction 30 20%
- Dilated cardiomyopathy 30 20%
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 30 20%
- Abnormal right ventricle 30 20%
From ACDC challenge website, dataset pages (overview, training, testing)
Condition by split
Reported cross table. A dot marks a cell the source does not give.
| Training | Test | |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy control | 20 | 10 |
| Myocardial infarction | 20 | 10 |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | 20 | 10 |
| Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | 20 | 10 |
| Abnormal right ventricle | 20 | 10 |
From ACDC challenge website, dataset pages (overview, training, testing)
License and access
Our reading of the license, not legal advice. Before you use the data, read the original license and confirm that your use is allowed. We take no responsibility for how you use a dataset. Full disclaimer
Download without an account
ACDC dataset license terms (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 with additional terms)
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, narrowed by two extra terms: use is allowed strictly for non-commercial scientific research, and the ACDC paper by Bernard et al. (IEEE TMI 2018) must be cited. Shared adaptations must keep the same license.
What you can do
- No
- Not stated
- Conditional
- Conditional
- Conditional
What you can share
- Conditional
- Conditional
- Not stated
What you must do
- Yes
- Yes
- Conditional
- Ethics approval No
- Manuscript review No
- Release code No
- Return results No
- Delete after use No
Limits
- No
- Location limits No
Citation
Bernard O, Lalande A, Zotti C, Cervenansky F, et al. Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved? IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 37(11), 2514-2525 (2018). doi:10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502
Sources
Every number on this page comes from one of these documents. Each chart names the table or page it is taken from. The raw numbers are in stats.csv.